----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Delany" <MarkD+dkim(_at_)yahoo-inc(_dot_)com>
To: <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy
DKIM+SSP is defining "damaged".
+1
SSP does not attempt to evaluate the reputation of the sender or client. A
good intention client can use SSP as well as the bad intention client. The
main objective of SSP is to establish a protocol consistency and to use the
deviation from the consistency as part of a failure detection system.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html