Dave Crocker wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
As was already discussed in the comments to the requirements draft, not all
DNS providers give their customers the ability to do subdomain level NS
delegation and so while that approach is good for those who can do it, it
leaves out a portion of the potential user base.
Let's be very clear here: not every DNS provider has the ability to do TXT
records either. Those small businesses, etc, should either pressure their
providers or vote with their feet.
1. Initial DKIM deployment relies upon support of DNS TXT records. We either
accept that or we start over. Hence, any discussion of non-support of TXT
records strikes me as counter-productive.
2. How does support for TXT records affect the current discussion about
Author-vs-Operator domain name, used for signing and assessment?
Dave. I'm merely pointing out that lack of support by some DNS providers
for NS records is not a good argument since many/most do not support
using TXT records either.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html