On 10 Aug 2006, at 6:55 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
Some of us believe, rather strongly, that this is a particularly
important
"bias" to the development of the requirements list. It occurs, to
me, however,
that it might not be clear whether there is working group consensus
on it.
I would be interested in seeing statements of preference for, or
against, having
the requirements be minimalist, and include only those items for
which there is
clear rough consensus to include.
If an item engenders real wg controversy, it is *not* included.
Comments?
Minimalist good.
Jon
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html