ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms

2006-08-01 09:06:56
from [John Levine] [Permanent Link] 
Agreed.  As Stephen pointed out, it's the absence of A's signature
that is the real point I'm driving at.


OK.  So would A's SSP say I sign all my mail, or something else?

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Michael Thomas
Next by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Arvel Hathcock
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman
Next by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Michael Thomas
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]