Dave Crocker wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
OK a new point, the SSP requirements need to be addressed to different
audiences:
1) Authors of software
2) Operators of software.
I don't recall seeing this mentioned before!
Are "requirements" documents now expected to contain boilerplate requirements
that apply to every single specification produced by the IETF? How is that
helpful?
Fair enough. But in this case, there has perhaps been some
confusion as a result of not seeing this difference, so
raising it on the list seems reasonable/useful.
It probably does map into either zero or one sentence in a
reqs. document, as you say, since its such a generic point.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html