Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:02:40 -0700 Jim Fenton <fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I can see this going either way. In the end the operator controls what
goes
out and what doesn't. Both the author domain and the operator domain
can
allow bad things to happen. Only the operator is in a position to be
assured of preventing them.
I'm pretty sure I have the "operator" terminology messed up, then.
Maybe it's me that's messed up. Using Dave's operator terminology, I
thought that meant the entity running the MTA (e.g. the ISP or domain host).
I think you're using it the same way as Dave, but your message doesn't
make sense
to me because there may not even be an "operator domain" in the path
(ie, author-receiver
directly). I think I also read that you said that you'd expect operator
signatures to be
the prevelent ones, but I'd expect just the opposite: author domain
signatures will be far
and away the most prevalent. This certainly is the case right now.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html