ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Corrected copy - Requirements addition: Policy/Practice record for first party signatures

2006-08-09 14:29:05
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 16:53, Michael Thomas wrote:
Scott ---

Scott -- I think it's both explicit and specific in other requirements
that the protocol
must publish that data, and some of those are MUST strength. I really
don't see why
we need to restate that here.

That and I don't think there is any explicit or implicit proscription
here on when the
protocol ought not be invoked. The restriction on was forcing new
behavior for a
DKIM verifier, not on how the protocol could be used.

OK.  You've spent a lot more time with the document than I have.  I'll accept 
that.

I'll keep an eye on it when we get to design.

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>