On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:48:05 -0400 <Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com> wrote:
An invalid signature is not unsigned, but we are not discussing that
policy point yet :-)
OK. If you have a useful distinction that can be made without creating a
trivially exploitable trivial hole, I think that now, when requirements are
being discussed, is the right time to do it.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html