Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms

Stephen Farrell wrote:

> I guess, if agreed, that'd suggest a potential non-requirement for SSP,
> "no need to specify who's not supposed to sign".

+1, and added.

      Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html