Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail

2006-08-01 21:55:42

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:29:21 -0700 Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

Is there any discovery related requirement here other than the "must 
complete
in deterministic number of steps" one that we all seem to agree on?


Just a nit, I would have thought it would have been complete in no more 
than a deterministic number of steps?

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Scott Kitterman <=

Previous by Date:	[ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Scott Kitterman
Previous by Thread:	[ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L
Next by Thread:	RE: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Patrick Peterson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]