I cannot see how SSP can do anything but make false positives more
likely. The real question is whether the gain in eliminating harmful
mail is worth the occassional false positive. So if what you are saying
is true, law firms would be literally nuts to turn SSP "I sign
everything" on, and so I'm surprised to hear that you think they should.
At the moment, I agree with you. Considering the value of the messages,
I'm surprised we don't see more fake mail saying that a case has been
dismissed or a hearing postponed. If that happened, the answer might be
different.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html