Actually I have a business plan where people pay me to make the
reports on their behalf.
Making reports could improve your reputation.
That's a fine idea, use the extortion plan of some blacklisters for
whitelisters. Several of these plans are in the market. I get howled at
all the time because some folks pay other folks for a good reputation
and my users happily report them as spam and they get blocked by the
spam engines.
Thanks,
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Damon
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:58 PM
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
Actually I have a business plan where people pay me to make the
reports on their behalf.
Making reports could improve your reputation.
Will it have a "Only one entry per household" rule? _sniff_
I kind of like the idea. I have an issue with implementation and all
the spamming that will be done to the yet to be developed protocol
though. We went through this "new protocol" argument with SPF. I am
hoping that people will have learned their lesson and say.. if it
doesn't break base, adding new protocols, etc. as an option isn't
automatically dismissed.
Damon Sauer
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html