ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements addition: Policy/Practice record for first party signatures

2006-08-09 10:33:28
--- 542,556 ----
         for signing its messages to a non-related domain in such a way
         that it does not require active participation by the non-related
         domain.  That is, the published information MUST have a way to
!         specify the domains that are allowed to sign on its behalf.
!         Signatures by such delagatees SHOULD be treated like First Party
!         DKIM signatures.

--- 542,556 ----
         for signing its messages to a non-related domain in such a way
         that it does not require active participation by the non-related
         domain.  That is, the published information MUST have a way to
!         specify the domains that are allowed to sign on its behalf.
!         Signatures by such delagatees SHOULD be treated like First Party
!         DKIM signatures.


I am thinking that the SHOULD might be a MUST.


!         specify the domains that are allowed to sign on its behalf.
!         Signatures by such delagatees MUST be treated like First Party
!         DKIM signatures.

Regards,
Damon Sauer
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>