Re: [ietf-dkim] 1358 ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition neede

In <452CFAF5(_dot_)7010102(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> Stephen Farrell 
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> writes:

> Doug,
>
> That was agreed to be closed on the jabber session.
That's a bummer.  I still think it is a good idea.  Oh well.


-wayne
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html