IETF DKIM (date)
October 24, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:08
- {Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Secrtion 6.3 Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Stephen Farrell, 12:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Secrtion 6.3 Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Jim Fenton, 11:56
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Stephen Farrell, 10:02
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), Dave Crocker, 07:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Stephen Farrell, 07:15
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:15
- [ietf-dkim] Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base), The IESG, 07:07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Bill.Oxley, 06:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Secrtion 6.3 Comments ondraft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hector Santos, 02:43
October 23, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Stephen Farrell, 14:53
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Stephen Farrell, 14:10
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:56
- [ietf-dkim] Secrtion 6.3 Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:32
- [ietf-dkim] More Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:19
- [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-02.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:54
- [ietf-dkim] Revised -base, -overview and -ssp-requirements, Dave Crocker, 09:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber this Thursday..., Stephen Farrell, 08:52
- [ietf-dkim] Jabber this Thursday..., Stephen Farrell, 00:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-06.txt, Stephen Farrell, 00:31
October 18, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: fate of ssp-reqs draft..., Eliot Lear, 12:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New issue: fate of ssp-reqs draft..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:49
- [ietf-dkim] No jabber tomorrow..., Stephen Farrell, 03:29
October 17, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: fate of ssp-reqs draft..., Paul Hoffman, 15:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: fate of ssp-reqs draft..., Scott Kitterman, 14:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, Scott Kitterman, 14:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, Michael Thomas, 14:12
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, david repking, 14:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, Scott Kitterman, 13:55
- [ietf-dkim] New issue: fate of ssp-reqs draft..., Stephen Farrell, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, Stephen Farrell, 13:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, Scott Kitterman, 13:28
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382, Michael Thomas, 13:15
October 16, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] www.dkim.org is now a full-fledged "direct" web address, Dave Crocker, 23:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1360, "delegation" vs "designation"., Scott Kitterman, 13:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365, with a question about the "we never send mail", Damon, 12:40
- RE: Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:09
- Re: Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type), Scott Kitterman, 10:22
- Re: Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type), wayne, 10:04
- Re: Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type), wayne, 09:35
- Re: Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type), Scott Kitterman, 07:47
- Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type), Stephen Farrell, 07:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Scott Kitterman, 06:30
- [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: 67th IETF Agenda], Stephen Farrell, 06:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Michael Thomas, 06:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Jim Fenton, 04:22
October 15, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Eliot Lear, 23:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Scott Kitterman, 19:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Jim Fenton, 19:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Scott Kitterman, 13:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Eliot Lear, 13:22
October 14, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365, with a question about the "we never send mail", Steve Atkins, 10:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365, with a question about the "we never send mail", Dave Crocker, 10:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365, with a question about the "we never send mail", Scott Kitterman, 10:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365, with a question about the "we never send mail", Stephen Farrell, 09:46
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type, Scott Kitterman, 08:43
- [ietf-dkim] 1365, with a question about the "we never send mail", Scott Kitterman, 08:18
- [ietf-dkim] 1360, "delegation" vs "designation"., Scott Kitterman, 07:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1358 ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Scott Kitterman, 07:56
October 11, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, Stephen Farrell, 09:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, Scott Kitterman, 09:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, Stephen Farrell, 09:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, Michael Thomas, 09:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, Damon, 08:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, Stephen Farrell, 08:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, william(at)elan.net, 08:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1358 ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed., Stephen Farrell, 07:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended, Stephen Farrell, 07:36
- [ietf-dkim] San Diego agenda, Stephen Farrell, 07:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and VBR tester available, Stephen Farrell, 07:36
- [ietf-dkim] Jabber tomorrow 1500 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 07:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1360: ssp-requirements-01 // Designated Signing Domain Scenario missing, Stephen Farrell, 07:13
October 06, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Eliot Lear, 23:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what IS the status of open issues?, Eliot Lear, 23:16
- [ietf-dkim] what IS the status of open issues?, Dave Crocker, 17:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Using mailing list to work through open issues, Michael Thomas, 12:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Using mailing list to work through open issues, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Using mailing list to work through open issues, Stephen Farrell, 11:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Using mailing list to work through open issues, Dave Crocker, 10:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Using mailing list to work through open issues, Jon Callas, 10:23
October 05, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Bill.Oxley, 19:43
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Bill.Oxley, 10:58
- [ietf-dkim] Using mailing list to work through open issues, Dave Crocker, 10:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Steven M. Bellovin, 10:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Steven M. Bellovin, 10:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Hector Santos, 09:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Michael Thomas, 09:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Steve Atkins, 09:22
- [ietf-dkim] Re: DKIM jabber room problems -- meeting cancelled, Frank Ellermann, 09:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 09:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Dave Crocker, 08:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Paul Hoffman, 08:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Steve Atkins, 08:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Dave Crocker, 08:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Eliot Lear, 08:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Michael Thomas, 08:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 08:02
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM jabber room problems -- meeting cancelled, DKIM Chair, 07:56