william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Doug,
That was agreed to be closed on the jabber session.
No-one spoke against that, so please consider this closed/rejected.
You're quite wrong.
If so, apologies. Can you point me at the mail archive please? (I
mean since we discussed this in the jabber session and I posted
the summary.)
> Number of people spoke - just not on the jabber.
You're abusing jabber as means of making decision for WG items -
Overstated.
jabber is just a discussion forum for some group of WG participants
but as per IETF rules all decisions are really done based on discussions
on the list.
Of course,
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html