ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC

2006-10-08 05:46:49

Thanks Eliot,

Unless someone can point at something in the record
contradicting these dispositions please act on them,
say at the end of your Monday.

People can verify Eliot's conclusions, and/or answer Dave's
question themselves by looking through the summaries of the
jabber logs that I sent after each jabber chat.

Stephen.

Eliot Lear wrote:
Disclaimer: this is really the province of the chairs, but as an
individual, here is my view:

Dave Crocker wrote:

Eliot Lear wrote:
Many of the issues are awaiting confirmation from the chairs that I
should close them.  In some cases this is due simply to an apparent
consensus on the jabber session that no change should be made, but that
it would be confirmed on the mailing list.
Eliot,

Thanks for the follow-up and clarification.

What items are in need of working group discussion?

Here is a summary from rt.psg.com and some Eliot commentary

1201:  PROPOSED CLOSED && NO FURTHER DISCUSISON
1356:  OPEN - no next action listed
1357:  Mike to clarify text
1358:  PROPOSE REJECT - consensus on jabber not to proceed
1359:  PROPOSED CLOSED - long jabber log
1360:  OPEN "heading toward close/reject" with discussion on the list
1361:  CLOSE/ACCEPT/MOOT since the entire section involved is disappearing
1362:  OPEN awaiting resolution of 1357
1363:  ACCEPTED, Dave to Assist Mike with text.
1364:  ACCEPT - Mike to confirm that this area is covered.  Probably an
email to the list is in order.
1365:  OPEN (half of it, anyway)
1366:  consensus to REJECT on the jabber.
1367:  consensus to REJECT on the jabber.
1369:  consensus to REJECT on jabber

So, by my reading, 1357 and 1365 are open and not blocked, while others
that are open are awaiting some action.  Barring an action from the
chairs I will close all those that are "PROPOSE REJECT" or "PROPOSE
CLOSED" in the next day or so (they can always be reopened if the chairs
find I've erred).

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html