On Wednesday 24 January 2007 01:34, Jim Fenton wrote:
If the signer wants to make sure that messages are not subject to
"append attacks", they shouldn't use l=. Use the default.
IIRC, every time someone brings up l= problems, the response is don't use it.
Is there a problem it solves that we need it? If it's inherently risky and
should not be used, I'm wondering if it should even be in the RFC?
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html