IETF DKIM (date)
January 27, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Cullen Jennings, 21:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Stephen Farrell, 17:49
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Frank Ellermann, 15:52
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The DKIM WG is within security?, Bill.Oxley, 14:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Dave Crocker, 13:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Cullen Jennings, 10:40
January 26, 2007
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The DKIM WG is within security?, Douglas Otis, 18:19
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The DKIM WG is within security?, Bill.Oxley, 17:25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt, Frank Ellermann, 16:58
- [ietf-dkim] The DKIM WG is within security?, Douglas Otis, 15:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt, Eric Allman, 08:33
- [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt, Frank Ellermann, 07:29
January 25, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank linesfor SIMPLE c14n., Douglas Otis, 18:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank linesfor SIMPLE c14n., Jon Callas, 17:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank linesfor SIMPLE c14n., Douglas Otis, 17:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Jon Callas, 16:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Tony Hansen, 16:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt, Scott Kitterman, 15:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Eric Allman, 15:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt, Eric Allman, 15:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Charles Lindsey, 04:28
January 24, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Jim Fenton, 19:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Jim Fenton, 19:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Jim Fenton, 19:35
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Jon Callas, 14:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Jon Callas, 14:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Hector Santos, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Scott Kitterman, 11:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., John Levine, 11:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Scott Kitterman, 10:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Hector Santos, 09:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Jim Fenton, 09:18
January 23, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Scott Kitterman, 22:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, John Levine, 17:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Paul Hoffman, 17:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Section 8.1 Misuse Of Body Limit - Needs some Insight here!, Jim Fenton, 17:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Jim Fenton, 17:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Hector Santos, 14:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Hector Santos, 14:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Charles Lindsey, 13:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Arvel Hathcock, 11:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 changes, Arvel Hathcock, 10:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Hector Santos, 10:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Eliot Lear, 08:43
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Bill.Oxley, 08:11
January 22, 2007
- [ietf-dkim] Issue: Section 8.1 Misuse Of Body Limit - Needs some Insight here!, Hector Santos, 23:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, J.D. Falk, 17:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Stephen Farrell, 16:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, J.D. Falk, 15:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Hector Santos, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Charles Lindsey, 13:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Paul Hoffman, 12:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Eric Allman, 09:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Hector Santos, 05:51
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: tag l=2 and dealing with leading blank lines for SIMPLE c14n., Hector Santos, 05:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Hector Santos, 05:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Charles Lindsey, 03:59
January 21, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Hector Santos, 11:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Stephen Farrell, 11:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Charles Lindsey, 10:53
- Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Charles Lindsey, 10:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 changes, Dennis Dayman, 10:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Hector Santos, 05:02
January 19, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 changes, John Levine, 20:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, John Levine, 20:16
- [ietf-dkim] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt, Frank Ellermann, 20:03
- [ietf-dkim] Re: example.edu, Frank Ellermann, 19:10
- {Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-08.txt, Internet-Drafts, 17:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Paul Hoffman, 16:34
- [ietf-dkim] New IANA considerations: standards track or just RFC?, Paul Hoffman, 15:01
- [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6, Paul Hoffman, 14:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] example.edu (was: basic question), RL 'Bob' Morgan, 14:07
- [ietf-dkim] example.edu (was: basic question), Frank Ellermann, 13:57
- [ietf-dkim] Re: draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Frank Ellermann, 13:41
- RE: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Bill.Oxley, 11:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 changes, Stephen Farrell, 09:19
- [ietf-dkim] Mailing list signatures, Bill.Oxley, 09:18
- [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 changes, Bill.Oxley, 09:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Barry Leiba, 07:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-08 submitted, Stephen Farrell, 04:59
January 10, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiplelinked signatures, Scott Kitterman, 21:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiplelinked signatures, Scott Kitterman, 15:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Eric Allman, 14:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Hector Santos, 13:47
- [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Frank Ellermann, 13:44
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: New SSP Requirement - Body Truncation Limits, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Eric Allman, 13:25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Frank Ellermann, 13:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: New SSP Requirement - Body Truncation Limits, Hector Santos, 13:11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: New SSP Requirement - Body Truncation Limits, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:51
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: New SSP Requirement - Body Truncation Limits, Hector Santos, 10:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Hector Santos, 10:24
- [ietf-dkim] Meeting in Prague..., Stephen Farrell, 09:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Hector Santos, 08:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiplelinked signatures, Dave Crocker, 08:36
January 09, 2007
- [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Frank Ellermann, 22:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Hector Santos, 15:16
- [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Frank Ellermann, 09:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim, Paul Hoffman, 09:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim, Hector Santos, 05:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim, Charles Lindsey, 04:27
January 08, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim, Eric Allman, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim, Tony Hansen, 11:57
- [ietf-dkim] Re: canonicalized null body and dkim, Frank Ellermann, 11:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim, Hector Santos, 05:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim, Charles Lindsey, 04:56
January 05, 2007
- RE: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiplelinked signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hector Santos, 11:57
- RE: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiplelinked signatures, Bill.Oxley, 11:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Michael Thomas, 10:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Wietse Venema, 05:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] mutant message validation, was Base issue: multiple linked signatures, John Levine, 04:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 03:39
January 04, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 13:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 12:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Scott Kitterman, 12:44
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, william(at)elan.net, 12:27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, John Levine, 11:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Scott Kitterman, 10:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Michael Thomas, 10:39
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, John L, 10:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Arvel Hathcock, 09:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Stephen Farrell, 08:41
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:40
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Stephen Farrell, 05:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Dave Crocker, 05:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 05:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Stephen Farrell, 05:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 04:46
January 03, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hector Santos, 23:10
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, william(at)elan.net, 20:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, John R Levine, 19:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, william(at)elan.net, 14:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 13:56
- Re: Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Hector Santos, 04:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Stephen Farrell, 04:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 03:57
- Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures, Charles Lindsey, 03:41