On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:58:20 -0000, Stephen Farrell
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:
Well, happy new year all.
Having looked through this, I see no consensus for this
addition/change other than perhaps to weaken the "MUST NOT"
on the "z=". Correct me if I'm wrong there.
No, weakening it is all I am asking for. Then signers/verifiers will be
able to devise bizarre schemes if they really can't see any other way
around their problem (which they should try to do if they can).
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html