[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
Stephen Farrell wrote:
If anything, change this text:
...
I think we need some text containing no MUST/SHOULD/MAY at all,
The current text was the result of significant discussion and
a rather careful effort to focus on the primary concern.
Take out the normative quality to the text and you lose the
real stricture that was the entire intent we chose.
Turn the MUST to a MAY has you reverse the agreement that was
developed about that concern.
That is a meta-argument.
At this point we have a last-call objection to close. 'We decided differently'
is not a valid move in a last call discussion.
If the point was argued and consensus reached there should be someone who can
give a rationale for MUST NOT as opposed to SHOULD NOT.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html