ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] Base issue: multiple linked signatures

2007-01-04 07:33:33

[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker

Stephen Farrell wrote:
If anything, change this text:
...

I think we need some text containing no MUST/SHOULD/MAY at all,

The current text was the result of significant discussion and 
a rather careful effort to focus on the primary concern.

Take out the normative quality to the text and you lose the 
real stricture that was the entire intent we chose.

Turn the MUST to a MAY has you reverse the agreement that was 
developed about that concern.

That is a meta-argument.

At this point we have a last-call objection to close. 'We decided differently' 
is not a valid move in a last call discussion. 

If the point was argued and consensus reached there should be someone who can 
give a rationale for MUST NOT as opposed to SHOULD NOT.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>