ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6

2007-01-22 16:41:54


J.D. Falk wrote:
Not sure if it's a +1 to Paul or a -1 to Doug, but either way I agree with Paul and John here. We need -base yesterday; save the endless intractable arguments for SSP.

So I hope that that's you volunteering for some Gordian knot work
on SSP in a short while:-)

Seriously though, once we get a sense of the WG wrt base-08, then
I want us to restart work on SSP, so we should all sharpen our
opinions for next week,

Thanks,
S.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>