Charles Lindsey wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:57:57 -0000, Hector Santos
<hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com> wrote:
The statement in question, if anything, which applies to the general
case offline or online mail clients, simply states:
"Delayed VERIFICATION is discouraged after reception of a
signed DKIM message."
No, it doesn't say that either.
In so many words, thats is EXACTLY what it means. The more you delay
the verification, the higher the chances of finding revoked keys. Common
sense? Absolutely. The very first sentence begins with that premise.
I think that, since this wording is being interpreted in different ways
by different peopls, it is a clear case of needing rewriting so that
_everyone_ agrees what it means.
Nah, its fine IMO. The only disagreement is ONE person (guess who? DOUG)
who just wants DKIM processing moved to the MUA - PERIOD and we already
had lengthy discussions on the issue of delayed verifications either at
the MTA, MDA or MUA and their timing relationship to revoked and/or
expired keys.
See
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim/draft-santos-dkim-rcvd-00.txt
---
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html