ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Change to Section 6

2007-01-22 15:26:55
On 1/19/07 7:07 PM, John Levine wrote:

I disagree with Doug and agree with the wording in the current document.

I'm with Paul, I do not want to reopen the arguments about how long a
verification key should or shouldn't be around.

Not sure if it's a +1 to Paul or a -1 to Doug, but either way I agree with Paul and John here. We need -base yesterday; save the endless intractable arguments for SSP.

--
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Product Platform Group
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>