-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 19, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Maybe we want "RFC only", not "standards track only", particularly
so that people can create Experimental RFCs and have them be used
in an interoperable fashion as a way of determining whether they
should later be elevated to standards track.
Good reasoning. I also concur.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.5.2
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFFt8/wsTedWZOD3gYRArxMAJ9ydijTylFCICkdyf5XQ+53R6jTRACfWllD
oZuJ4JxQ7t4KZzpg/2SzdBY=
=9Rq1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html