Defintely yes - I think the phone call last time was very productive
so I will work with the chairs to see if we can set up something
similar.
On Jan 27, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hi Cullen,
I think Frank summarised things nicely when he said:
Frank Ellermann wrote:
- RFC required (that's what the WG DKIM apparently wants)
...
- standards action (maybe you want this, but the WG doesn't)
In your original discuss text [1], you mention pros and cons
and you also say you'd be happy to talk about those.
What are they? And how can they help us square this circle
where the WG wants thing-A and your discuss calls for
thing-B?
Thanks,
Stephen.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?
command=view_comment&id=60908
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html