On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:18:32 -0800 Douglas Otis
<dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org>
wrote:
DKIM's restrictions on linking signatures with a header was premised
upon an expectation that visual examination of headers provided a
means for recognition.
Would you please point me to a reference for this statement?
I recall saying 2822.From should be signed because it's a mandatory element
of an e-mail message. You seem to remember a different WG discussion than
I do.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html