> The problem is that UNLESS you have the ability to tell people that
> your signing practices are transitional the policy language will be
> insufficiently expressive to provide any value.
Seems to me signers will just sign with both algorithms for a period of
time. Regardless of what is expressed in policy, that can't help the
sender know the level of deployment of a new verifier capable of
handling the new algorithm.
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html