IETF DKIM (date)
February 28, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, SM, 20:24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Bill.Oxley, 18:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Arvel Hathcock, 18:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Michael Thomas, 18:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, Arvel Hathcock, 18:06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, Scott Kitterman, 17:57
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:54
- Re: 1368 straw-poll : (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks), Arvel Hathcock, 17:52
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Arvel Hathcock, 17:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Arvel Hathcock, 17:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, Hector Santos, 17:22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, Bill.Oxley, 16:39
- [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no, Stephen Farrell, 16:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] req 6.3.8 support?, Scott Kitterman, 15:31
- [ietf-dkim] so can we get to some decisions now..., Stephen Farrell, 15:29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Eric Allman, 14:31
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Paul Hoffman, 13:28
- Re: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Michael Thomas, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker, 11:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Eric Allman, 11:24
- [ietf-dkim] Characteristics for describing an SSP proposal, Dave Crocker, 11:16
- RE: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:57
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Eric Allman, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Scott Kitterman, 09:27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Frank Ellermann, 09:09
- [ietf-dkim] req 6.3.8 support?, Michael Thomas, 08:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Charles Lindsey, 07:33
- Re: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Charles Lindsey, 07:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hector Santos, 07:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Charles Lindsey, 07:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Hector Santos, 06:55
- Re: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Hector Santos, 06:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Graham Murray, 05:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Stephen Farrell, 02:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Graham Murray, 00:57
February 27, 2007
- Re: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Jim Fenton, 22:12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Michael Thomas, 20:10
- Re: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Paul Hoffman, 19:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Steve Atkins, 19:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Michael Thomas, 18:49
- RE: Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:30
- Additional lookups (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll), Jim Fenton, 17:28
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Bill.Oxley, 16:54
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Jim Fenton, 16:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Michael Thomas, 16:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Eric Allman, 16:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Hector Santos, 15:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Jon Callas, 15:40
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:39
- [ietf-dkim] Issue 1365: drop "never send mail"?, Eric Allman, 15:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Today's jabber notes..., Michael Thomas, 14:38
- RE: [ietf-dkim] We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Stephen Farrell, 09:56
- RE: [ietf-dkim] We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Stephen Farrell, 09:04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:48
- [ietf-dkim] Re: We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Michael Thomas, 07:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Stephen Farrell, 07:25
- [ietf-dkim] We are actually disagreeing on the point of policy Was RE: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Stephen Farrell, 06:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Charles Lindsey, 06:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Charles Lindsey, 05:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Charles Lindsey, 05:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Eliot Lear, 01:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Today's jabber notes..., Eliot Lear, 01:08
- Re: 1368 straw-poll : (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks), John R Levine, 00:59
February 26, 2007
- Re: 1368 straw-poll : (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks), Jon Callas, 17:43
- [ietf-dkim] Issue 1386 and downgrade attacks, Eric Allman, 15:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Damon, 14:07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Hector Santos, 12:20
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:16
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Dave Crocker, 11:58
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Paul Hoffman, 11:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, EKR, 11:40
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Hector Santos, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Dave Crocker, 11:14
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Paul Hoffman, 11:06
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Mark Delany, 10:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Mark Delany, 10:26
- Re: 1368 straw-poll : (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks), Michael Thomas, 10:13
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, EKR, 10:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Stephen Farrell, 10:01
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll, Dave Crocker, 09:51
- more 1368 discussion (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :), Michael Thomas, 09:30
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Michael Thomas, 09:27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:10
- RE: 1368 straw-poll : (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7:Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:02
- Re: 1368 straw-poll : (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks), John Levine, 08:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Michael Thomas, 08:27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, John Levine, 08:23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Michael Thomas, 07:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Michael Thomas, 07:29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 1368 straw-poll :, Michael Thomas, 06:54
- 1368 straw-poll : (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks), Stephen Farrell, 04:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Charles Lindsey, 04:09
February 25, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Michael Thomas, 16:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Non-Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, John Levine, 15:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Dave Crocker, 15:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Paul Hoffman, 14:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Jon Callas, 13:16
- [ietf-dkim] Email upgrade history, Dave Crocker, 13:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Jon Callas, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Michael Thomas, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Michael Thomas, 11:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Tony Hansen, 11:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, John Levine, 09:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Today's jabber notes..., John Levine, 09:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Charles Lindsey, 06:14
February 23, 2007
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Dave Crocker, 16:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hector Santos, 15:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Paul Hoffman, 14:39
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade andDowngrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Today's jabber notes..., Stephen Farrell, 14:14
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Today's jabber notes..., Frank Ellermann, 13:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Hector Santos, 13:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Dave Crocker, 13:12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Paul Hoffman, 12:44
- [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:58
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Today's jabber notes..., Bill.Oxley, 07:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Today's jabber notes..., Stephen Farrell, 06:23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Today's jabber notes..., Frank Ellermann, 05:42
February 21, 2007
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Jabber reminder - tomorrow at 1600 UTC, Frank Ellermann, 14:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Jabber reminder - tomorrow at 1600 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 14:42
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Jabber reminder - tomorrow at 1600 UTC, Frank Ellermann, 14:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber reminder - tomorrow at 1600 UTC, Dave Crocker, 14:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy, Damon, 14:26
- [ietf-dkim] Jabber reminder - tomorrow at 1600 UTC, Stephen Farrell, 14:11
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Policy, Stephen Farrell, 14:11
- [ietf-dkim] Policy, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:43
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Configuring "unacceptable" domains, Bill.Oxley, 12:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Configuring "unacceptable" domains, Scott Kitterman, 11:48
- [ietf-dkim] Protocol Action: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard, The IESG, 11:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-10 submitted, Stephen Farrell, 08:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-10 submitted, Barry Leiba, 07:50
February 14, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Milestone dates...., Paul Hoffman, 15:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Milestone dates...., Arvel Hathcock, 15:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Milestone dates...., Scott Kitterman, 14:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Milestone dates...., Stephen Farrell, 08:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Milestone dates...., Scott Kitterman, 08:37
- [ietf-dkim] SSP restart, Stephen Farrell, 05:01
- [ietf-dkim] Milestone dates...., Stephen Farrell, 05:00