"1399: Mike to add a requirement like "the protocol MUST be crystal
clear as to when SSP must be invoked" and then CLOSE this"
I may implement check SSP 1st to see if their policy signs or not
I may not use SSP at all
And of course I may check SSP every time I have a DKIM signed message.
Clear as mud
thanks
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications
404-847-6397
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:26 PM
To: ietf-dkim
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Today's jabber notes...
..attached. Please check to see if something you care about
was discussed since there weren't enough people present
to be confident of rough consensus.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html