Frank Ellermann wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
I've copied the names of the entries below as well to help speed
that up for you.
Thanks, but I only vaguely recall what's what even with complete
titles, these issues are almost six months old.
The "six months" is a fair point.
If no-one else gets to it before Monday (hint hint) I'll
sort something out for these issues (I would do it, but its
late here now, sorry).
As to the tool more generally, feel free to bring it up wherever
you think.
For now I've submitted the issue to ietf-action(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, after all
it did work until summer 2005 when somebody messed with it.
Sounds like a plan,
S.
If you want to suggest/host something else for our next document
feel free to say so on the list and we'll consider it.
The "trac" Wiki used by the IESG works from my POV (= read access).
1365 SSP: typos open dkim Nobody 0
nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de 5 months ago 5 months ago
5
Oops, that was the ticket I recall, where folks wanted "no mail"...
1398 (No subject) open dkim Nobody 0
lear(_at_)ofcourseimright(_dot_)com 3 months ago 3 months ago 0
...but what was that ? Checking the GMaNe search form:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dkim/6592/match=1398
If that's the issue it was about resent mail originally from an
author claiming to use a "strict" signing policy.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html