Stephen Farrell wrote:
If no-one else gets to it before Monday (hint hint)
At least I've now identified a part of #1398. The general
question is: "What is the relevant SSP for a mail arriving
without (incl. broken) DKIM signature" ?
Some folks here apparently think that the 2822-From has to
be used. I'm unconvinced for mails with a Sender or some
kind of Resent-* header fields.
For now I've submitted the issue to ietf-action(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org,
after all it did work until summer 2005 when somebody
messed with it.
Sounds like a plan,
Yes, for some minutes until they told me that rt.psg.com is
none of their business, and I've to convince randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com
that something with his ticket system doesn't work anymore.
"TLS is if ordinary users have to understand openssl, because
nobody else does"... <sigh />
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html