ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no

2007-02-28 18:06:53
+1 - ditch this fluff.

I have had some sympathy for this in the past but now I have to ask: Are we creating "Sender *SIGNING* Practices" or "Sender Practices In General"? Besides, there are already at least two other ways with more traction to achieve this particular goal.

Arvel

Stephen Farrell wrote:

issue #1365 calls for eliminating requirement
6.3.2 which says:
" [PROVISIONAL] The Protocol MUST be able to publish a Practice
        which is indicative that domain doesn't send mail."

If you want to eliminate that requirement say: +1
If you want to keep that requirement say: -1

Remember: wordsmithing is for later.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>