ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Deployment Scenario 7: Cryptographic Upgrade and Downgrade Attacks

2007-02-25 12:53:43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 23, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:


Color me confused.  I thought we agreed long ago that downgrade  
attacks were not an issue for the problem DKIM addresses.


We did. Downgrade attacks are not an issue for the problem DKIM  
addresses.

        Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.5.3
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFF4eh8sTedWZOD3gYRAuVDAJwJx9wuSMYcUghq8qKdv4LnhND+kgCeO3UH
hIiQXPKypej+5sgvLv8GHFc=
=lurz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>