<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1365>
Issue 1365 (Subject: SSP: typos) includes this brief comment from
Frank:
5.3 (2): IIRC we've identified "never send mail" as a special
case of "strict", and then just not sending mail, let
alone signing it. IMO you can delete this point.
Based on the notes we seem the WG seems to be favoring dropping the
"never send mail" indication because it's redundant, but we never
seem to have gotten final consensus.
It makes sense to me. Does anyone want to argue that it needs to
stay? (Foolish me, I meant to say "Who wants to argue...".)
eric
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html