On Wednesday 28 February 2007 10:47, Michael Thomas wrote:
Does this requirement have support? I've seen no discussion on it that
I can recall which means that it probably doesn't.
Mike
8. [PROVISIONAL] The protocol MUST have the ability to provide
practices and expectations keyed off of the local part of the
[RFC2822].From address. As with all provisional requirements,
this requirement must not be in conflict with other
requirements, including DNS considerations, etc.
[INFORMATIVE NOTE: this requirement seems to have rather weak
support. It's mainly been added so that it can be issue-
tracked. /mat]
[Refs: Deployment Scenario 4]
In theory I can see it to mirror per user keys, but I'm not sure what problem
it would be solving. I'd suggest you hold on to it until we see what policy
requirements we are going to support and then we can make a determination if
any of those policy requirements are in need of per localpart support.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html