Steve Atkins wrote:
This POLICY and among others have been part of the design
discussions/debates process since the beginning with the original SSP
specs, the current SSP specs including my own DSAP and most
importantly, it being already MODELED in published DKIM/SSP open
source software.
It's been out of scope since day one. The argument for keeping it has
been "Yeah, it's out of scope, but what the hell, we're throwing stuff
that's far less useful into the pile of stuff. At least this one piece
has some conceivable real world use, lets keep it."
Huh?
Look, maybe I'm not privy to your "inner circle" and frankly I don't
care, but what I do care is how YOUR decisions might effect our product
line.
The SSP drafts, both OLD and NEW, all had "NO MAIL" considerations, so I
have no clue what what you are talking about it being "OUT OF SCOPE"
with some behind the scene whispers.
---
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html