ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: DNS Record type for SSP

2007-04-17 21:01:26
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 22:08, John Levine wrote:

If SSP needs a new RR, it needs one out of the gate.  Given that one
of its largest uses will be "this domain sends no mail", the ability
to wildcard across all one's non-existent subdomains would be rather
important, and you need a new RR to do that.

Isn't the lack of an A or MX record sufficient for non-existent domains?  Do 
we really need a new protocol to tell us a non-exitent domain is dodgy?

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html