And its not just packages, the information is frequently not visible because
there is a resolver in the way.
Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 08:39 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: Michael Thomas
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: Upward query vs. wildcard
publication
I just read both of these and I don't see how it contradicts anything
I've proposed. If the authority of a domain is a parent to the current
domain, it seems rather pointless to query all of the intermediate
labels in a treewalk. In this particular case, keeping query complexity
down is a lot more important than lots and lots and lots of unneeded
flexibility.
You want user-visible information to be based on zone boundaries,
although zone boundaries are not defined as a user-visible construct.
The real-world functional problems with this have already been
explained, by others.
What I am trying to make clear is that the fact that some packages might
give access to this information, it is nonetheless inappropriate for a
user-visible function to be based on access to zone boundary information.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html