Eliot Lear wrote:
An overview is not the place for normative statements. Can we discuss
this in person in Chicago?
Eliot, et al,
I think your response highlights the dilemma: There is the title (and the
original intent) and there is (possibly) a different reality to the current
content. On the theory that the current content is, in fact, useful,
something needs to be reconciled.
That's why I noted that the content has moved more towards an integrated
system-level (or service-level) description of DKIM.
Take a look over the document for the various must/should/may language and
note that much of it seems like reasonable directives to folks seeking to
integrate a DKIM service component into their email software and operations.
That might well qualify as a service specification, along the lines that the
IETF frequently publishes as standards-track.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html