ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Tracing SSP's paradigm change

2007-12-06 11:01:31
On Thursday 06 December 2007 12:49, Steve Atkins wrote:

In a well-designed protocol based on DKIM, yes I'd agree that a
validly DKIM signed message should not provoke an SSP query.

But that's not the protocol we have.

I think RFC 5016 shows a lack of understanding of DKIM (or is choosing
not to consider some important features of DKIM), and is
part of the push to try and build a next generation SPF on
an inappropriate base authentication technology.

I think you aren't understanding the purpose of SSP at all.

If any random signature from any domain obviates the SSP, what possible use is 
SSP?

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>