[ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: revise list labeling

  If the Sender Signing Practices record for the domain does not exist
   but the domain does exist, Verifier systems MUST assume that some
   messages from this domain are not signed and the message MUST NOT be
   considered Suspicious.


I think the above text should be labeled #5, since it specifies a condition

different from #4?



--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: "does not exist", Dave Crocker

Next by Date:

[ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: strict vs. integrated, Dave Crocker

Previous by Thread:

[ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: "does not exist", Dave Crocker

Next by Thread:

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1532: revise list labeling, Jim Fenton

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]