ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1532: revise list labeling

2007-12-12 10:35:56
Dave Crocker wrote:

  If the Sender Signing Practices record for the domain does not exist
   but the domain does exist, Verifier systems MUST assume that some
   messages from this domain are not signed and the message MUST NOT be
   considered Suspicious.

I think the above text should be labeled #5, since it specifies a
condition
different from #4?

This list is not a procedure; it is describing the possible SSP check
results and the circumstances that lead to each.  But I'll agree that
it's a little bit strange to introduce "four possible results" when
there are only two:  Suspicious and not Suspicious.  This area does need
some rework.

-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>