RE: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP threats analysis needed

Dave Crocker wrote:

>     In spite of having a requirements document, the current SSP
> specification is not based on a coherent threats model.
> In fact working group participants have been demonstrating quite a
> large variance in the threats they think relevance.
> SSP cannot reach consensus unless there is first consensus about the
> problems it is trying to solve.
+1


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html