Re: [ietf-dkim] So...what's the current consensus?

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] So...what's the current consensus?

2008-01-02 07:45:38



J D Falk wrote:

...on any of the recent arguments?


Bear with us a bit. Barry's been offline for a while, but we've
got a mail summarising the status of each of the SSP issues
simmering.

S.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] So...what's the current consensus?, Stephen Farrell <=

Previous by Date:	[ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS, Julian Mehnle
Next by Date:	[ietf-dkim] Meeting at next IETF, Stephen Farrell
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP + SPF records in DNS (was: New Issue: Do we need SSP record for DKIM=unknown?), Douglas Otis
Next by Thread:	[ietf-dkim] Meeting at next IETF, Stephen Farrell
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]