IETF DKIM (thread)
[ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP,
Jim Fenton,
2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Paul Hoffman, 2008/01/25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Hector Santos, 2008/01/26
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, John Levine, 2008/01/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Wietse Venema, 2008/01/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, John Levine, 2008/01/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Damon, 2008/01/27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/28
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/28
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/28
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Damon, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, John Levine, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/27
[ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages,
Michael Thomas,
2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages, Damon, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/24
- [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, John Levine, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Damon, 2008/01/25
- [ietf-dkim] Price of Rice in China, Hector Santos, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, John L, 2008/01/25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/26
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/26
- Message not available
- Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/28
- Re: Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Paul Hoffman, 2008/01/28
- Re: Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/28
- Re: Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, ned+dkim, 2008/01/28
- Re: Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/28
- Re: Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Damon, 2008/01/28
- [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/28
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages, Damon, 2008/01/28
- Re: Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Tony Finch, 2008/01/28
- [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages, John Levine, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages, SM, 2008/01/24
[ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?,
Douglas Otis,
2008/01/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?, Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/22
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/25
[ietf-dkim] Seriously.,
J D Falk,
2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Steve Atkins, 2008/01/18
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously., Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Tony Finch, 2008/01/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Dave Crocker, 2008/01/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., ned+dkim, 2008/01/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Barry Leiba, 2008/01/21
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., J D Falk, 2008/01/21
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously., Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., ned+dkim, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Jim Fenton, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Jon Callas, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Jim Fenton, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Jon Callas, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously., Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously., Jon Callas, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously., Douglas Otis, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Srsly., J D Falk, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Michael Thomas, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Dave Crocker, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Douglas Otis, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Hector Santos, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Dave Crocker, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Hector Santos, 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Srsly., Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/24
- reasons to ignore valid SSP (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Srsly.), J D Falk, 2008/01/24
- Re: reasons to ignore valid SSP (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Srsly.), Steve Atkins, 2008/01/24
- Re: reasons to ignore valid SSP (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Srsly.), Eliot Lear, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., ned+dkim, 2008/01/23
- New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously.), Stephen Farrell, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields asinput to SSP, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields asinput to SSP, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Michael Thomas, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Jim Fenton, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Douglas Otis, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Jim Fenton, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Damon, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Douglas Otis, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Douglas Otis, 2008/01/22
- Message not available
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., SM, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., John Levine, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., robert, 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Jim Fenton, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Dave Crocker, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Damon, 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy, John Levine, 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy, John L, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy, Wietse Venema, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/24
- [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Hector Santos, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Douglas Otis, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously., Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Michael Thomas, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Dave Crocker, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Michael Thomas, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Dave Crocker, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Michael Thomas, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Dave Crocker, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., SM, 2008/01/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., Audian Paxson, 2008/01/21
- re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously., hsantos, 2008/01/24
[ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics,
Dave Crocker,
2008/01/14
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/15
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/16
- 1:1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), J D Falk, 2008/01/16
- Re: 1:1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/16
- Re: 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), John Levine, 2008/01/16
- Re: 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), Jim Fenton, 2008/01/16
- Re: 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), John L, 2008/01/16
- Re: 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), Jim Fenton, 2008/01/16
- Re: 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), John L, 2008/01/17
- Re: 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics), Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, John L, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, John L, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, Hector Santos, 2008/01/17
- [ietf-dkim] OT: 300, 000 bounces (was: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties), Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] OT: 300, 000 bounces (was: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties), John Levine, 2008/01/17
- [ietf-dkim] Re: OT: 300,000 bounces, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: OT: 300,000 bounces, John Levine, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, John L, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, John L, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1, John L, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1, John L, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties, Damon, 2008/01/22
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Jon Callas, 2008/01/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, robert, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John Levine, 2008/01/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, robert, 2008/01/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/21
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, robert, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, robert, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, robert, 2008/01/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, robert, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, John L, 2008/01/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, robert, 2008/01/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, J D Falk, 2008/01/16
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthorbreaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthorbreaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Hector Santos, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, robert, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/16
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics), J D Falk, 2008/01/16
- Re: MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics), Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics), Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics), Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics), Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics), Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics), Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Stephen Farrell, 2008/01/18
- [ietf-dkim] 1534 (was: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics), Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, SM, 2008/01/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Hector Santos, 2008/01/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/19
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/18
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/18
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- combine Arvel's, Doug's, and John's ideas (?), Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- combine Arvel's, Doug's, and John's ideas (?), Douglas Otis, 2008/01/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- combine Arvel's, Doug's, and John's ideas (?), Damon, 2008/01/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jon Callas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jon Callas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, robert, 2008/01/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/16
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jeff Macdonald, 2008/01/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jeff Macdonald, 2008/01/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/29
- [ietf-dkim] DNS delegation takes care of the authorization, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/30
- [ietf-dkim] Issue 1542: SSP Restrictive Policies Recommendation for an RFC 4871 update, Hector Santos, 2008/01/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Jeff Macdonald, 2008/01/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/31
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/31
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/31
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Hector Santos, 2008/01/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/15
[ietf-dkim] SSP issues status,
Stephen Farrell,
2008/01/10
- [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP issues status, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/10
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/14
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Stephen Farrell, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Stephen Farrell, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, John Levine, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Wietse Venema, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Steve Atkins, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, J D Falk, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, John Levine, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Wietse Venema, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Wietse Venema, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Wietse Venema, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Damon, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Wietse Venema, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Mark Delany, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Steve Atkins, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/24
- [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation (was: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages), Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation (was: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages), Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1521 will damage DKIM/SSP, Hector Santos, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation, Hector Santos, 2008/01/25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation, Hector Santos, 2008/01/25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP vs. reputation, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP vs. reputation, Hector Santos, 2008/01/25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP vs. reputation, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/25
- [ietf-dkim] Reputation vs SSP, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Mark Delany, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/25
- reputation is orthogonal (RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages), J D Falk, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Jeff Macdonald, 2008/01/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Damon, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Michael Thomas, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Scott Kitterman, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, John Levine, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Arvel Hathcock, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Steve Atkins, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/24
- [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, Frank Ellermann, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, robert, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Hector Santos, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, Steve Atkins, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSPtounsigned messages, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, robert, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, Siegel, Ellen, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSPtounsigned messages, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSPtounsigned messages, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, John Levine, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works, John Levine, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works, Hector Santos, 2008/01/24
- [ietf-dkim] The first Internet mailing list, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works, Douglas Otis, 2008/01/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works, robert, 2008/01/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages, Charles Lindsey, 2008/01/25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, Bill.Oxley, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages, Damon, 2008/01/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, Barry Leiba, 2008/01/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/14
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, J D Falk, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, Steve Atkins, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, John Levine, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, Eliot Lear, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/15
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, J D Falk, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, Jim Fenton, 2008/01/15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status, Dave Crocker, 2008/01/15