[ietf-dkim] Re: Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP

Jim Fenton wrote:
 
> Publish ssp with dkim=strict and t=s and it will not apply to
> subdomains like thirdparty.bank.com.
Good t=s example, something like it in the draft would be nice.
I risk a "RTFM, already there" without checking for this... ;-)

 Frank


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html