On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:34:27 -0000, Jim Fenton <fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
wrote:
There's a fourth option that is designed to cover exactly this case:
4) Publish ssp with dkim=strict and t=s and it will not apply to
subdomains like thirdparty.bank.com.
Of course, when you do this, it applies to all subdomains (and
hostnames), not just thirdparty.
But can't you publish a full strict SSP for example.com, and also a
separate not-so-strict SSP for billing.example.com? Or am I missing
something? But that does mean you need to be able to say 'unknown'.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html