Charles Lindsey wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:34:27 -0000, Jim Fenton <fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
wrote:
There's a fourth option that is designed to cover exactly this case:
4) Publish ssp with dkim=strict and t=s and it will not apply to
subdomains like thirdparty.bank.com.
Of course, when you do this, it applies to all subdomains (and
hostnames), not just thirdparty.
But can't you publish a full strict SSP for example.com, and also a
separate not-so-strict SSP for billing.example.com? Or am I missing
something? But that does mean you need to be able to say 'unknown'.
Yes, that works too, but it was implied in the original question that
the subdomain hadn't [yet] published an SSP record for the subdomain.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html