Jon Callas wrote:
I think we should fall back to a minimal SSP that contains only the "I-
SIGN-ALL" policy, and we let the real-world deployment and desires for
additions control more in SSP than that. SSP2 can start in a year or
two, and then we see what is needed in the real world. We can even
have experimental things in the field to test them.
That's a suggestion in a different direction (issue #1520). The issue
here is how we obtain the policy, be it the minimal "I-SIGN-ALL" that
you advocate or the richer policy that is in the current draft. Is it
queried based on the [first] author's domain, the authors' domain(s), or
the sender's domain?
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html