ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics

2008-01-17 11:02:04
Jon Callas wrote:

I think we should fall back to a minimal SSP that contains only the "I-
SIGN-ALL" policy, and we let the real-world deployment and desires for additions control more in SSP than that. SSP2 can start in a year or two, and then we see what is needed in the real world. We can even have experimental things in the field to test them.

That's a suggestion in a different direction (issue #1520). The issue here is how we obtain the policy, be it the minimal "I-SIGN-ALL" that you advocate or the richer policy that is in the current draft. Is it queried based on the [first] author's domain, the authors' domain(s), or the sender's domain?

-Jim

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>